CRITICAL PARADIGM ANALYSIS OF THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE DIGITAL ERA IN VINCENT MOSCO'S VIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/icofeb.v2i-.1085Keywords:
Vincent Mosco, Political Economy of Media, Mass Media, Public, Critical ParadigmAbstract
Vincent Mosco is a prominent academic in the field of media and technology political economy. His work focuses on the interplay between power, media, and information technology, particularly how capitalism and globalization influence communication systems. Mosco highlights how media and technology corporations shape and control the flow of information, with significant implications for society. The political economy of media maps the economically and politically powerful entities that dominate global and national media ownership, including in Indonesia. When a few corporations control the media industry, they inevitably dominate public discourse. Mosco's theory emphasizes the study of social relations, particularly power dynamics in the production, distribution, and consumption of resources. Key concepts include commodification, structuration, and spatialization. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method with a critical paradigm. Data were gathered through discussions with experts in communication, politics, and business economics, along with literature reviews and observations of current media realities. The findings reveal that global and national media should avoid falling into oligarchy, monopoly, and hegemony. The media must uphold its role as the third pillar of democracy rather than serve as a tool for oligarchic politics. The public must recognize that media conglomeration is a political-economic issue, remain critical of media conglomerates, and demand access to accurate and reliable information. Strengthening media studies, monitoring, and regulation is essential to ensure that mass media operates democratically. These findings aim to contribute to both theoretical and practical discussions on the political economy of media in the digital age.
References
Aryadi, Armin. 2024. Ekonomi Digital Dan Transformasi Bisnis Di Indonesia. TOHAR MEDIA.
Butsi, Febry Ichwan. 2019. “Memahami Pendekatan Positivis, Konstruktivis Dan Kritis Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Communique 2.1 2(1): 48–55.
Eka Wenata Wuryanta. 2018. “Teori Kritis Dan Varian Paradigmatis Dalam Ilmu Komunikasi.” https://osf.io/quxtn/.
Hasan, K. 2016. “Komunikasi Sebagai Proses Politik Dan Ekonomi.” : 1–8.
Hasan, Kamaruddin. 2013. “Ekonomi Politik Media Dan Konvergensi Media.” Proceding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi (November): 1–23.
Hasan, Kamaruddin, and Deddy Satria. 2009. “Kapitalisme, Organisasi Media Dan Jurnalis: Perspektif Ekonomi Politik Media.” Dinamika Fisip Unbara Palembang 2(3): 1–18.
Jones , PIP, et al. Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial.
Lim, Merlyna. 2012. “The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia.” Research Report: 1–20. http://www.public.asu.edu/~mlim4/files/Lim_IndoMediaOwnership_2012.pdf.%0Ahttp://www.public.asu.edu/~mlim4/files/Lim_IndoMediaOwnership_2012.pdf.
Maryani, Eni, Preciosa Alnashava Janitra, and Detta Rahmawan. 2019. MACOM III Universitas Padjajaran 2019: Communication & Information Beyond Boundaries Bias Gender Dalam Artikel Di Media Lokal.
McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy. New Press.
Rachmawati, Windyaningrum, D Saroyant Vina, and Setiawan Diwan. 2015. “Media Massa Sebagai Lembaga Ekonomi Yang Berkedaulatan Rakyat.” In Search (Informatic, Science, Entrepreneur, Applied Art, Research, Humanism), Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia 12(04): 35–47. http://repository.unibi.ac.id/id/eprint/268.
Salim, Agus, and Ali Forman. 2006. Pengantar Dan Berfikir Kualitatif Dalam Agus Salim: Teori Dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogjakarta.: Tiara Wacana.
Salvatore Simarmata. 2014. “Media Baru, Ruang Publik Baru, Dan Transformasi Komunikasi Politik Di Indonesia Core.” : 18–36. http://www.library.ohiou.edu/indopubs/search/se.
Sujoko, Anang, and Muhtar Haboddi. 2020. Media Dan Dinamika Demokrasi. Prenada Media.
Sutrisna, EM. 2013. “Penyakit Degeneratif.” jurnal kesehatan (maret): 8.
Tyas, Sagita Ning. 2010. “Konglomerasi Industri Media Penyiaran Di Indonesia Analisis Ekonomi Politik Pada Group Media Nusantra Citra.” : 1–102.
Widaningsih, T Titi. 2013. “Ideologi Gender Majalah Remaja : Analisis Wacana Kritis (Gender Ideology Teen Magazines : Critical Discourse Analysis).” Disertasi Universita(Juli).
Wuryanta, A G Eka Wenats. 2018. “Pendidikan Dan Arena Perebutan Dalam Media.” https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/8nxq5.
Zulfiningrum, Rahmawati. 2014. “Spasialisasi dan Praktik Konglomerasi Media Kelompok Kompas Gramedia.” Jurnal ASPIKOM 2(3): 140.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the proceeding right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding .
All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding 's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceeding .
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles by the author must declare the Proceedings of International Conference on Finance Economics and Business (ICOFEB) as the first party to publish the article.