CRITICAL PARADIGM ANALYSIS OF THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE DIGITAL ERA IN VINCENT MOSCO'S VIEW

Authors

  • Kamaruddin Hasan Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
  • Teuku Zulkarnaen Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
  • Jafaruddin Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
  • Safwan Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia
  • Zulfadli Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/icofeb.v2i-.1085

Keywords:

Vincent Mosco, Political Economy of Media, Mass Media, Public, Critical Paradigm

Abstract

Vincent Mosco is a prominent academic in the field of media and technology political economy. His work focuses on the interplay between power, media, and information technology, particularly how capitalism and globalization influence communication systems. Mosco highlights how media and technology corporations shape and control the flow of information, with significant implications for society. The political economy of media maps the economically and politically powerful entities that dominate global and national media ownership, including in Indonesia. When a few corporations control the media industry, they inevitably dominate public discourse. Mosco's theory emphasizes the study of social relations, particularly power dynamics in the production, distribution, and consumption of resources. Key concepts include commodification, structuration, and spatialization. This study employs a descriptive qualitative method with a critical paradigm. Data were gathered through discussions with experts in communication, politics, and business economics, along with literature reviews and observations of current media realities. The findings reveal that global and national media should avoid falling into oligarchy, monopoly, and hegemony. The media must uphold its role as the third pillar of democracy rather than serve as a tool for oligarchic politics. The public must recognize that media conglomeration is a political-economic issue, remain critical of media conglomerates, and demand access to accurate and reliable information. Strengthening media studies, monitoring, and regulation is essential to ensure that mass media operates democratically. These findings aim to contribute to both theoretical and practical discussions on the political economy of media in the digital age.

References

Aryadi, Armin. 2024. Ekonomi Digital Dan Transformasi Bisnis Di Indonesia. TOHAR MEDIA.

Butsi, Febry Ichwan. 2019. “Memahami Pendekatan Positivis, Konstruktivis Dan Kritis Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Communique 2.1 2(1): 48–55.

Eka Wenata Wuryanta. 2018. “Teori Kritis Dan Varian Paradigmatis Dalam Ilmu Komunikasi.” https://osf.io/quxtn/.

Hasan, K. 2016. “Komunikasi Sebagai Proses Politik Dan Ekonomi.” : 1–8.

Hasan, Kamaruddin. 2013. “Ekonomi Politik Media Dan Konvergensi Media.” Proceding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi (November): 1–23.

Hasan, Kamaruddin, and Deddy Satria. 2009. “Kapitalisme, Organisasi Media Dan Jurnalis: Perspektif Ekonomi Politik Media.” Dinamika Fisip Unbara Palembang 2(3): 1–18.

Jones , PIP, et al. Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial.

Lim, Merlyna. 2012. “The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia.” Research Report: 1–20. http://www.public.asu.edu/~mlim4/files/Lim_IndoMediaOwnership_2012.pdf.%0Ahttp://www.public.asu.edu/~mlim4/files/Lim_IndoMediaOwnership_2012.pdf.

Maryani, Eni, Preciosa Alnashava Janitra, and Detta Rahmawan. 2019. MACOM III Universitas Padjajaran 2019: Communication & Information Beyond Boundaries Bias Gender Dalam Artikel Di Media Lokal.

McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet against Democracy. New Press.

Rachmawati, Windyaningrum, D Saroyant Vina, and Setiawan Diwan. 2015. “Media Massa Sebagai Lembaga Ekonomi Yang Berkedaulatan Rakyat.” In Search (Informatic, Science, Entrepreneur, Applied Art, Research, Humanism), Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia 12(04): 35–47. http://repository.unibi.ac.id/id/eprint/268.

Salim, Agus, and Ali Forman. 2006. Pengantar Dan Berfikir Kualitatif Dalam Agus Salim: Teori Dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogjakarta.: Tiara Wacana.

Salvatore Simarmata. 2014. “Media Baru, Ruang Publik Baru, Dan Transformasi Komunikasi Politik Di Indonesia Core.” : 18–36. http://www.library.ohiou.edu/indopubs/search/se.

Sujoko, Anang, and Muhtar Haboddi. 2020. Media Dan Dinamika Demokrasi. Prenada Media.

Sutrisna, EM. 2013. “Penyakit Degeneratif.” jurnal kesehatan (maret): 8.

Tyas, Sagita Ning. 2010. “Konglomerasi Industri Media Penyiaran Di Indonesia Analisis Ekonomi Politik Pada Group Media Nusantra Citra.” : 1–102.

Widaningsih, T Titi. 2013. “Ideologi Gender Majalah Remaja : Analisis Wacana Kritis (Gender Ideology Teen Magazines : Critical Discourse Analysis).” Disertasi Universita(Juli).

Wuryanta, A G Eka Wenats. 2018. “Pendidikan Dan Arena Perebutan Dalam Media.” https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/8nxq5.

Zulfiningrum, Rahmawati. 2014. “Spasialisasi dan Praktik Konglomerasi Media Kelompok Kompas Gramedia.” Jurnal ASPIKOM 2(3): 140.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-23