Community Governance Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis
Keywords:
community governance, bibliometricAbstract
Community governance is a collaboration between the public, private, and nonprofit sectors to achieve desired outcomes in a jurisdiction, whether it is a neighborhood or an entire municipality. It is government exercised at the community level, where all decisions are made with and by the community, and the outcomes achieved are also aimed at the community. Many researchers have studied community governance an increasingly evolving topic. This research aims to determine the development of publication trends regarding community governance. This research uses quantitative methods with bibliometric analysis techniques. The data analyzed are the most productive countries and organizations in publication, co-authorship, and co-occurrence. The results show that the publication in community governance from 1954-2023 has increased year by year with different issues. America and Europe are the most productive countries in publication, with the most productive affiliations are universities in Australia. The analysis of co-authorship results in multiple researchers indicating their level of publication productivity based on their activity in producing publications as sole authors or in collaboration with other authors. The latest topics related to community governance and becoming trends are health and environmental issues. The next research can focus on the dynamics of public policy in community governance.
References
Baker, H. K., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty years of the Journal of Futures Markets: A bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027-1054. doi:10.1002/fut.22211
Banner, G. (2002). Community governance and the new central–local relationship. International Social Science Journal, 54(112), 217-231.
Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building Community Capacity: A Definitional Framework and Case Studies from a Comprehensiv Community Initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(291). doi:10.1177/10780870122184876
Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1998). Community governance, community leadership and the new local government. New York: York Publishing Services.
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2002). The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity. Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
Baltimore: Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98k72547
Lund, D. (2018). Governance innovation for climate change adaptation in urban Denmark. Journal of Environmental Palocy and Planning, 20(5), 632-644. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1480361
Mishra, M., Sudarsan, D., Santos, C. A., Mishra, S. K., Kar, D., Barak, K., & Pattnaik, N. (2021). An overview of research on natural resources and indigenous communities: a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus database (1979–2020). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(2). doi:10.1007/s10661-020-08793-2
Nath, S., Thomson, W. M., Baker, S. R., & Jamieson, L. M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology: Fifty years of publications. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. doi:10.1111/cdoe.12910
Natsir, M. (2016). Surau dan Upaya Mewujudkan Self Governing Community di Sumatera Barat. Kompetensi Pendamping Pembangunan Desa, 135.
Pillora, S. (2011). Local Government and Community Governance:A Literature Review.
Australia: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.
Samsara, L. (2022). Tren publikasi collaborative governance sebuah analisis bibliometrik.
Jurnal Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 18(2). doi:10.22146/bip.v18i2.5513
Shah, e. a. (2020). Prosumption:bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSViewer. Kybernets,
(3). doi:1020-1045.10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
Sidiq, M. (n.d.). Panduan analisis bibliometrik sederhana. Universitas Negeri Jakarta. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.15688.37125
Totikidis, V., Armstrong, A., & Francis, R. (2005). The Concept of Community Governance: A Preliminary Review. Refereed paper presented at the GovNet Conference. Melbourne: Monash University. Retrieved 7 7, 2023, from http://vuir.vu.edu.au
Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Incestigating the emerging COBID-19 research trens in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Shresta, A., Zhou, X., Teng, M., Wang, P., & Wang, G. (2023). Exploring the Main Determinants of National Park Community Management: Evidence from Bibliometric Analysis. Forest, 14(9). doi:10.3390/f14091850
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anifa Aprilia Sejati, Sudarmo Sudarmo, Rina Herlina Haryanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the proceeding right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles by the author must declare the Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference On Education Social Humanities And Innovation (Miceshi) as the first party to publish the article.