Differentiated Assessment Of End Of School Assessments Using Msat With Ispring Platform At Sma Negeri 1 Matang Kuli In 2022/2023

Authors

  • Khairuddin Khairuddin SMA Negeri 1 Matang Kuli

Keywords:

Multi Stage Adaptive Test (MSAT), Differentiated Assessment

Abstract

Multi Stage Adaptive Test (MSAT) is an assessment pattern that can be used in stages as a differentiated assessment. Through this assessment pattern, a comprehensive assessment approach is obtained from a student's cognitive learning outcomes. In the 2022/2023 academic year, SMA Negeri 1 Matang Kuli made a breakthrough innovation in the end-of-school assessment. Referring to the pattern of the national minimum competency assessment (AKM), the end-of-school assessment at SMA Negeri 1 Matang Kuli is held digitally using the iSpring platform. The end-of-school assessment is intended for grade XII as the last summative exam at the high school level. Each teacher in class XII prepares questions with three levels, (1) easy, (2) medium and (3) difficult. Each level consists of 10 items based on literacy and numeracy level questions. The MSAT pattern is carried out in a way: (1) each student gets the same level of questions, which is moderate, (2) students automatically get a score after the stage I exam. The digital exam system publishes stage II questions on each student's ability in stage I, (3) If the student gets a high score, the questions obtained are at a difficult level in stage II. Likewise, students who get low scores will get easy questions and students who get medium scores will get medium level questions, (4) Students will get the same treatment to answer questions in stage III as a final assessment. Thus, students answer 30 questions in total in the End of School Assessment at SMA Negeri 1 Matangkuli with a final score that is measured at the student's ability level. In the 2022/2023 academic year, SMA Negeri 1 Matangkuli students are still dominantly at the low cognitive level on average.

References

Desjardins, C. D., & Bulut, O. (2018). Handbook of educational measurement and psychometrics using R. CRC Press.

Drasgow, F., Whetzel, D. L., & Oppler, S. H. (2012). Strategies for test validation and refinement. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied Measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management. Psychology Press.

Kentaro Yamamoto, Hyo Jeong Shin and Lale Khorramdel. (2019). Introduction of multistage adaptive testing design in PISA 2018. OECD Education Working Paper No. 209.

Kusuma, Oscarina Dewi, M.Pd & Luthfah, Siti, M.Pd. (2020). Modul Paket 2, Modul 2.1, Memenuhi Kebutuhan Belajar Murid Melalui Differentiated learning. Program Guru Penggerak. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2014). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises. In Measurement Theory in Action: Case Studies and Exercises. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452224749

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tomlinson, Carol Ann. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classroom, 2nd Edition. Virginia, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Yuli Mulyawatia, MS Zulela , Edwita. (2022). Differentiation Learning to Improve Students' Potential in Elementary School. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Vol. 06, No. 01, April 2022. ISSN: 2550-0406, DOI: 10.55215/pedagonal.v5i2.4485

Yulianto, A. (2010). Efektivitas Computerized Adaptive Testing: Studi eksperimental dengan Raven’s Advance Progressive Matrices Test. Conference Proceeding: National Conference on Experiment Psychology, 288–298

Van den Akker J., dkk. (2006). Educational Design Research. London and New York: Routledge

Published

2024-01-31