Utilizing Toraja Culture to Address the Demands of Mathematics Education in the 21st Century

Authors

  • Suri Toding Lembang 5Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja ,Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
  • Nurdin Arysad UniversitasKristen Indonesia Toraja ,Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
  • Bernard Bernard Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja ,Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Linggih Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja ,Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
  • Yusem Ba’ru Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja ,Toraja, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Toraja culture, learning mathematics, 21st century

Abstract

Meeting the challenges and competition in 21st-century education involves the cultivation of learners capable of navigating an increasingly globalized world. This necessitates the development of critical, independent, and disciplined thinking skills. Contemporary education goes beyond enhancing cognitive, attitudinal, and psychomotor abilities; it centers on learning frameworks encompassing Critical Thinking and Problem Solving, Communication, Creativity, and Collaboration Skills. Toraja culture has gained global recognition through its distinct elements such as ma’parapa, ma’kombongan kalua’, mantaa, and didosa. This research seeks to explore how school culture can be integrated to address the challenges of 21st-century mathematics education. The study, conducted qualitatively, employed interviews and open questionnaires for data collection. The findings reveal that Toraja culture, particularly ma’parapa, ma’kombongan kalua’, mantaa, and didosa, embodies cultural values encompassing moral, practical social, educational, and belief values. These values can be seamlessly integrated into classroom mathematics instruction to address the demands of 21st-century mathematics learning, particularly in terms of fostering critical, independent, and disciplined thinking.

References

B. Trilling and C. Fadel, 21st century skill, First edition. United States of America: Jossey-Bass, 2009.

W. Chasanah, M. F. Nasrulloh, and F. Darmawan, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Pertidaksamaan Irasional Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Discovery,” vol. 06, no. 01, p. 6, 2020.

A. S. Nurhayati, K. Kusnandar, N. A. Mega, and Warisno, “Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Terintegrasi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Pada Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar,” Teknodik, pp. 69–88, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.32550/teknodik.vi.793.

R. Rahayu, S. Iskandar, and Y. Abidin, “Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia,” basicedu, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2099–2104, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082.

D. Rahadian, “Pergeseran Paradigma Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Tinggi,” JPETIK, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1, 2018, doi: 10.31980/jpetik.v2i1.60.

N. Tamil, “Dinamika Pembelajaran Abad 21 Bagi Daerah Terpencil Dan Berkembang,” online, p. 6, 2019.

J. Irvine, “Positively Influencing Student Engagement and Attitude in Mathematics Through an Instructional Intervention Using Reform Mathematics Principles,” JEL, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 48, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.5539/jel.v9n2p48.

G. M. Tinungki, “The Role of Cooperative Learning Type Team Assisted Individualization to Improve the Students’ Mathematics Communication Ability in the Subject of Probability Theory,” Journal of Education and Practice, p. 5, 2015.

G. Sunzuma and A. Maharaj, “In-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge and awareness of ethnomathematics approaches,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1063–1078, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1736351.

A. J. Bishop, “Critical Challenges in Researching Cultural Issues in Mathematics Education,” Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 119–131, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1080/07256860220151041.

M. Civil, “Culture and Mathematics: A community approach,” Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–148, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1080/07256860220151050A.

G. Knijnik, “Curriculum, Culture and Ethnomathematics: The practices of ‘cubagem of wood’ in the Brazilian Landless Movement,” Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 149– 165, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1080/07256860220151050.

K. Owens, “The impact of a teacher education culture-based project on identity as a mathematically thinking teacher,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 186–207, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2014.892568.

L. Prieto, L. Claeys, and E. L. González, “Transnational Alliances: La Clase Mágica— Nepohualtzitzin Ethnomathematics Club,” Journal of Latinos and Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 125–134, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2015.1011470.

Lembang, S. T. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aljabar Linier pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(3), 249– 256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.0901/jkip.v6i3.419

Lembang, S. T., La’biran, R., & Kristanto. (2019). Ukiran Toraja sebagai Alat Peraga untuk Memperkenalkan Bangun Datar. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 33–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.0901/jkip.v8i2.858

H. Sari, “Kajian Nilai-Nilai Pada Teks Ma’parapa Dalam Prosesi Rampanan Kapa’ Di Toraja Utara,” p. 160, 2017.

J. S. Sande and Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Eds., Tata bahasa Toraja. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1997.

R. S. Situru and T. Tulak, “Ma’kombongan as A Form of Local,” p. 58, 2021.

Y. Mangolo and Kristanto, “Aluk To Dolo Versus Kristen,” vol. 3, no. 1, p. 10, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31