Comparison Of Maximal Marginal Relevance ( MMR) And Textrank Automatic Text Summarization Methods In Jurnal
Keywords:
maximal marginal relevance (mmr), textrank, summaryAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the application of the Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) and TextRank methods in automatic text summarization in journals in viewing the best model value in text automatically. This study can also implement an automatic text summarization application and find out the comparison between MMR and TextRank in the text summarization process in journals. Next research will evaluate the performance of the two models in producing relevant and informative text summaries. The problem of this research is how to overcome the problem of summarizing text with the basic concept of summary in providing the essence or overall content text in a journal. The main focus of this research is to display significant and relevant information in a more organized form and to display values for the efficiency of which model is the best after comparing the two models. The results of this research are a decision support system for determining the quality of poor rice using the fuzzy madm yager model with a value of (MMR) 0.4 and top N(3). The results of the comparison of the Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) similarity values are 0.510 and the score is 0.510, while the TextRank similarity is 0.510 and the score is 0.015. Based on testing of the two models, the best value was obtained from the rextrank model with a score of 0.015.
Keywords: maximal marginal relevance (mmr), textrank, summary
References
[1] N. Akhtar, M. M. S. Beg, and H. Javed, “TextRank enhanced Topic Model for Query focussed Text Summarization,” in 2019 Twelfth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Aug. 2019, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/IC3.2019.8844939.
[2] R. Robiyanto, N. Nugraha, and I. Apriatna, “Peringkasan Teks Otomatis Berita Menggunakan Metode Maximum Marginal Relevance,” JEJARING J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–32, May 2019, doi: 10.25134/jejaring.v4i1.6712.
[3] Y. K. Khor, C. W. Tan, and T. M. Lim, “Text Summarization on Amazon Food Reviews using TextRank,” in Conference Proceedings: International Conference on Digital Transformation and Applications (ICDXA 2021), 2021, pp. 113–120. doi: 10.56453/icdxa.2021.1011.
[4] R. T. Adek, Bustami, and M. Ula, “Systematics Review on the Application of Social Media Analytics for Detecting Radical and Extremist Group,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1071, no. 1, p. 012029, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1071/1/012029.
[5] N. Nurdin, R. Rizal, and R. Rizwan, “Pendeteksian Dokumen Plagiarisme dengan Menggunakan Metode Weight Tree,” Telematika, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 31, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.35671/telematika.v12i1.775.
[6] M. F. Hidayattullah and A. Azizi, “Peringkas Otomatis Teks Berbahasa Arab Menggunakan Algoritma TextRank,” J. Ilm. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–42, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.35316/jimi.v6i1.1231.
[7] A. M. A. Zeyad and A. Biradar, “Abstractive Multi-Document Summarization: Exploiting Maximal Marginal Relevance and Pretrained Models,” in 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Jul. 2023, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10307351.
[8] I. M. Karo Karo, S. Dewi, and A. Perdana, “Implementasi Text Summarization Pada Review Aplikasi Digital Library System Menggunakan Metode Maximum Marginal Relevance,” JEKIN - J. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 25–31, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.58794/jekin.v4i1.671.
[9] D. P. Purbawa, Malikhah, R. N. Esti Anggraini, and R. Sarno, “Automatic Text Summarization using Maximum Marginal Relevance for Health Ethics Protocol Document in Bahasa,” in 2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS), Oct. 2021, pp. 324–329. doi: 10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9607951.
[10] Y. Yuliska and K. U. Syaliman, “Literatur Review Terhadap Metode, Aplikasi dan Dataset Peringkasan Dokumen Teks Otomatis untuk Teks Berbahasa Indonesia,” IT J. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–31, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.25299/itjrd.2020.vol5(1).4688.
[11] S. I. K and S. R. Balasundaram, “Phrase Embedding Based Multi Document Summarization with Reduced Redundancy using Maximal Marginal Relevance,” in 2020 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICELTICs), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICELTICs50595.2020.9315474.
[12] D. F. AL-Hafiidh, I. F. Rozi, and I. K. Putri, “Peringkasan Teks Otomatis pada Portal Berita Olahraga menggunakan metode Maximum Marginal Relevance.,” J. Inform. Polinema, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 21–30, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33795/jip.v8i3.519.
[13] R. Kurmi and P. Jain, “Text summarization using enhanced MMR technique,” in 2014 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, Jan. 2014, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICCCI.2014.6921769.
[14] Shasha Xie and Yang Liu, “Using corpus and knowledge-based similarity measure in Maximum Marginal Relevance for meeting summarization,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 2008, pp. 4985–4988. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518777.
[15] S. Yu, J. Su, P. Li, and H. Wang, “Towards High Performance Text Mining,” Int. J. Grid High Perform. Comput., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 58–75, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.4018/IJGHPC.2016040104.
[16] A. Babu G. L. and S. Badugu, “Extractive Summarization of Telugu Text Using Modified Text Rank and Maximum Marginal Relevance,” ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resource Lang. Inf. Process., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1–18, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3600224.
[17] S. Zaware, D. Patadiya, A. Gaikwad, S. Gulhane, and A. Thakare, “Text Summarization using TF-IDF and Textrank algorithm,” in 2021 5th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Jun. 2021, pp. 1399–1407. doi: 10.1109/ICOEI51242.2021.9453071.
[18] U. Rani and K. Bidhan, “Comparative Assessment of Extractive Summarization: TextRank, TF-IDF and LDA,” J. Sci. Res., vol. 65, no. 01, pp. 304–311, 2021, doi: 10.37398/JSR.2021.650140.
[19] G. Sharma and D. Sharma, “Automatic Text Summarization Methods: A Comprehensive Review,” SN Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 33, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01446-w.
[20] R. T. Adek and M. Ula, “A Survey on The Accuracy of Machine Learning Techniques for Intrusion and Anomaly Detection on Public Data Sets,” in 2020 International Conference on Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Business Analytics (DATABIA), Jul. 2020, pp. 19–27. doi: 10.1109/DATABIA50434.2020.9190436.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Alif, Muhammad Alif Al Fattah Alif, Rini Meiyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s).
2. The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work.
5. Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
