Handling Environmental Damage: A Descriptive Study of Socio-Ecological Approaches in Conserving Cunda’s River

Authors

  • Fauzi Fauzi Department of Sociology at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Malikussaleh University; 14351, Buket Indah, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Nuriman Nuriman Department of Islamic Education Management, Faculty of Tarbiyah, State Islamic Institute of Lhokseumawe, 24351, Alue Awe, Indonesia
  • Aiyub Aiyub Department of Public Administration at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Malikussaleh University; 14351, Buket Indah, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Iskandar Zulkarnen 4Department of Politic at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Malikussaleh University; 14351, Buket Indah, Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/icospolhum.v4i.370

Keywords:

Environmental, Socio-Ecological, Conserving and River

Abstract

The phenomena of environmental damage associated with local community culture, and policies of related agencies in an effort to prevent damage to the river environment. The study focuses on handling environmental damage, which reveals facts in a qualitative descriptive manner that incorporates elements of community, culture, and government policy with a socio-ecological approach. Research has been carried out in three sub-districts in Lhokseumawe City. The three sub-districts that are the research locations are densely populated areas. The data was analyzed inductively to reveal patterns of handling environmental damage to the river by carrying out an intrinsic assessment of the data through relevant sources and carrying out source checks with in-depth research. Carry out comparisons with other sources to strengthen the issues studied and analyze data by using an inductive-qualitative approach. The study found the aspect is an important basis for fostering an environmentally caring attitude in communities around the river. Studies also found that the impact of environmental damage on nature will produce more eccentric arguments. Thus, the socio-ecological approach is effective in building community awareness against damage to the natural environment while protecting water quality and threats to existing biota.

References

Abidin, A. Z., & Steven, S. (2021). Study on Indonesian plastic marine debris based on river survey. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1143(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1143/1/012049

Adolph, K. E. (2020). An Ecological Approach to Learning in (Not and) Development. In Human Development (Vol. 63, Issues 3–4). https://doi.org/10.1159/000503823

Asian Development Bank (ADB), Mehta, A., Sandhu, S. C., Kinkead, B., & Teipelke, R. (2017). Catalyzing Green Finance: A Concept for Leveraging Blended Finance for Green Development. In Asian Development Bank.

Babchuk, W. A., & Boswell, E. (2022). Grounded theory. In International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11013-9

Betancourt, H., Hardin, C., & Manzi, J. (1992). Beliefs, Value Orientation, and Culture in Attribution Processes and Helping Behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022192232004

Clemson, L., Stark, S., Pighills, A. C., Torgerson, D. J., Sherrington, C., & Lamb, S. E. (2019). Environmental interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Vol. 2019, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013258

de Smedt, P. (2010). The use of impact assessment tools to support sustainable policy objectives in Europe. Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03623-150430

Elfithri, R., Mokhtar, M. Bin, & Abdullah, M. P. (2021). Water and environmental sustainability in Langkawi UNESCO Global Geopark, Malaysia: issues and challenges towards sustainable development. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07537-x

Grainger, T. N., Senthilnathan, A., Ke, P. J., Barbour, M. A., Jones, N. T., Delong, J. P., Otto, S. P., O’connor, M. I., Coblentz, K. E., Goel, N., Sakarchi, J., Szojka, M. C., Levine, J. M., & Germain, R. M. (2022). An Empiricist’s Guide to Using Ecological Theory. American Naturalist, 199(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/717206

Kendall, B. E. (2015). Some directions in ecological theory. Ecology, 96(12). https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2080.1

Leduc, G., Manevska-Tasevska, G., Hansson, H., Arndt, M., Bakucs, Z., Böhm, M., Chitea, M., Florian, V., Luca, L., Martikainen, A., Pham, H. V., & Rusu, M. (2021). How are ecological approaches justified in European rural development policy? Evidence from a content analysis of CAP and rural development discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.009

Lewis, A. S. L., Rollinson, C. R., Allyn, A. J., Ashander, J., Brodie, S., Brookson, C. B., Collins, E., Dietze, M. C., Gallinat, A. S., Juvigny-Khenafou, N., Koren, G., McGlinn, D. J., Moustahfid, H., Peters, J. A., Record, N. R., Robbins, C. J., Tonkin, J., & Wardle, G. M. (2023). The power of forecasts to advance ecological theory. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13955

Liu, J., Zhou, H., Chen, F., & Yu, J. (2022). The coevolution of innovation ecosystems and the strategic growth paths of knowledge-intensive enterprises: The case of China’s integrated circuit design industry. Journal of Business Research, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.008

Mahanty, S., Milne, S., Barney, K., Dressler, W., Hirsch, P., & To, P. X. (2023). Rupture: Towards a critical, emplaced, and experiential view of nature-society crisis. Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206221138057

McGreavy, B., & Hart, D. (2017). Sustainability Science and Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication, 1.

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Feyisa, G. L. (2020). A global view of regulatory ecosystem services: existed knowledge, trends, and research gaps. In Ecological Processes (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00241-w

Mielke, K. P., Schipper, A. M., Heskes, T., Zijp, M. C., Posthuma, L., Huijbregts, M. A. J., & Claassen, T. (2022). Discovering Ecological Relationships in Flowing Freshwater Ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.782554

Mishra, D., Akman, I., & Mishra, A. (2014). Theory of Reasoned Action application for Green Information Technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030

Petriello, M. A., Redmore, L., Sène-Harper, A., & Katju, D. (2021). Terms of empowerment: Of conservation or communities? ORYX, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000036

Pusparini, W., Sievert, P. R., Fuller, T. K., Randhir, T. O., & Andayani, N. (2015). Rhinos in the parks: An island-wide survey of the last wild population of the Sumatran rhinoceros. PLoS ONE, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136643

Scheffer, M., Van Bavel, B., Van De Leemput, I. A., & Van Nes, E. H. (2017). Inequality in nature and society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(50). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706412114

Singhal, S. (2003). Environmental threats, vulnerability and adaptation: case studies from India. Environmental Threats, Vulnerability and Adaptation: Case Studies from India, July.

Sumiati, A., Widyastuti, U., Takidah, E., & Suherman. (2021). The millennials generation’s intention to invest: A modified model of the theory of reasoned action. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(3).

Waloven, S., Kapsar, K., Schwoerer, T., Berman, M., I. Schmidt, J., Viña, A., & Liu, J. (2023). Global gateways as telecoupled human and natural systems: The emerging case of the Bering Strait. Ambio, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01835-2

Williams, D. M., Descola, P., & Palsson, G. (1998). Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3034440

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25