Formulation of the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in Seeking the Truth about Past Human Rights Violations in Aceh

Authors

  • M. Reza Fahlevi Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Jalan Mayjen T. Hamzah Bendahara, Kuta Alam, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia 24415. Tel: +6282-320002229
  • Ramzi Murziqin Faculty of Social Sciences and Government Sciences, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Banda Aceh, Jalan Ar-Raniry Kopelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia 23111

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/icospolhum.v4i.466

Keywords:

Truth Seeking, TRC of Aceh, human rights violation, challenge and obstacle

Abstract

This journal describes the formulation and implementation of the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission (KKR) in revealing the truth regarding human rights violations that occurred in Aceh in the past.  Aceh is one of the regions in Indonesia that has experienced armed conflict for decades involving the government and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) group.  This period of conflict has led to many cases of human rights violations, and the Aceh TRC has an important role in revealing the truth and seeking reconciliation between the parties involved.  This journal will use a research methodology combining a qualitative approach and document analysis to investigate the role and performance of the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission (KKR).  Apart from that, this journal also evaluates the challenges and obstacles faced by the Aceh TRC in the process of revealing the truth.  The results of this research found that truth disclosure carried out by the Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission (KKR) can provide deeper insight into efforts to overcome human rights violations in Aceh and contribute to understanding the reconciliation process in areas that have been affected by conflict.

References

Amnesty International. (2018). "Aceh 15 Years On: Silence Is Not the Answer." Amnesty International.

Human Rights Watch. (2007). "From Madness to Hope: The 12-Year War in Aceh." Human Rights Watch.

Orentlicher, D. (2007). "Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime." The Yale Law Journal, 116(1), 183-232.

Akbar, Khairil. (2017). “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.” Lex Renaissance. Vol. 2. No. 2. PP. 195-212.

Pratiwi, Eka Auliana. (2019). “Campur Tangan Asing di Indonesia: Crisis Management Intiative dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Aceh (2005-2012).” Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah. Vol. 2 No. 2. PP. 83-90.

Fahlevi, M. Reza. (2022). “Peran Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh dalamPenyelesaian dan Pemenuhan Hak Korban Pelanggaran HAM Aceh.” Tesis. Lhokseumawe : Universitas Malikussaleh.

Lusia, H. (2010). “Mediasi Yang Efektif dalam Konflik Internal Studi Kasus : Mediasi oleh Criss Management Initiative dalam Proses Perdamaian Gerakan Aceh Merdeka dan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.” Tesis Universitas Indonesia.

Kasim, Ifdal. (2000). Briefing Paper Series tentang Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi, “Apakah ‘Komisi Kebenaran Dan Rekonsiliasi Itu?” Elsam. No. 1. PP. 1-18.

Natsif, Fadli Andi. (2016). “Perspektif Keadilan Transisional Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat.” Jurisprudentie. Vol. 3 No. 2. PP. 83-97.

Sujatmoko, Andrey. (2016). “Hak atas Korban pelanggaran HAM Berat di Indonesia dan Kaintannya dengan Prinsip Tangungg Jawab Negara dalam Hukum Internasional.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 3 No. 2. PP. 330-350.

Habermas, Jurgen. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

Issue

Vol. 4 (2024): Proceedings of International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright and grant the proceeding the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.

All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources, and the article's title should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this prodeeding.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.

In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare the Proceedings of  International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM) as the first party to publish the article.