Teaching Factory Model Based on Industrial Standard Innovation in Vocational High Schools

Authors

  • Jumadi Jumadi
  • Siraj Siraj
  • Syamsul Bahri
  • Wildan Zaqqi
  • Bagas Suanri

Keywords:

Teaching Factory, Learning Model, Vocational High School

Abstract

This study also aims to determine the extent to which the implementation of the Teaching Factory (TeFa) learning model can be adjusted to the product/service-based learning activities that have been previously carried out at the target schools and to identify the factors that influence the success of the program. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative research. The research was conducted at Vocational High School in Lhokseumawe, which has already implemented the teaching factory model. Data collection in this study used three techniques: in-depth interviews, participant observation and documentation study. The data analysis technique used is the interactive model which includes: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The research results indicate that (1) The TeFa learning model is an industry-based learning model that utilizes production units as a platform for running business or production processes. TeFa learning model developed in Vocational High Schools is integrated with production units for conducting practical activities for students. (2) The policy of school for TeFa learning is to align the existing curriculum with the curriculum needs of the industry. (3) The TeFa learning model is able to improve the competencies of students in the Mechanical Engineering expertise program in Vocational High Schools in Lhokseumawe.

References

[1]Dewi, S. S., & Sudira, P. The Contribution of Teaching Factory Program

Implementation on Work Readiness of Vocational High School Students in

Makassar. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 2018, volume 4 (2),

pp. 126–131.

[2]Rojaki et al., Manajemen Kerja Sama Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Dunia Usaha dan Dunia Industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2021, volume 5 (3), pp. 6337- 6349.

[3]Ixtiarto, B. & Sutrisno, B. Kemitraan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Dunia Usaha dan Dunia Industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 2021, volume 26, pp. 57-69.

[4]Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. The Teaching Factory Developments and Outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 2022, volume 23, pp. 1-6.

[5]Wibowo, N. Upaya Memperkecil Kesenjangan Kompetensi Lulusan

Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Tuntutan Dunia Industri. Jurnal

Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 2020, volume 23 (1), pp. 1-7.

[6]Widiyanto. Strategi pengembangan kurikulum berbasis kompetensi DUDI

untuk SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan, 2019, volume 2 (1), pp. 103-

116.

[7]Wibowo, N. Upaya Memperkecil Kesenjangan Kompetensi Lulusan

Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dengan Tuntutan Dunia Industri. Jurnal

Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 2022, volume 23 (1), pp. 34-31

[8]Sumantri D., Subijanto, S., & Sudiyono. Pengembangan Sekolah

Menengah Kejuruan Empat Tahun Bidang Keahlian Prioritas Program

Nawacita. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2022, volume 4 (2), pp. 152-168.

[9]Indriyani, Tuti. Manajemen Pengembangan Mutu Sekolah Menengah

Kejuruan Swasta dalam Peningkatan Keunggulan Bersaing. Jurnal HasilHasil Penelitian Al Izzah, 2020, volume 13 (1), pp. 117-123.

[10]Azizi, M., & Mahmoudi, R. Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education: Entrepreneurship Education for Knowing, Doing, Being, and Living Together. Journal of Education for Business, 2021, volume 94 (3), pp. 148–156.

[11]Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1998.

[12]Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M., Qualitative Data Analysis, CA: Sage Publication, 1994.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Egon G.G. Naturalistic Inquiry. California: SAGE Publications, 1985.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31