The Effect of STEAM Learning and Scientific Attitude on Students' Creative Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Halimatus Sakdiah Physical Education, Malikussaleh University
  • Fajrul Wahdi Ginting Physical Education, Malikussaleh University
  • Nimas Sri Rezeki Physical Education, Malikussaleh University
  • Agustina Miranda Physical Education, Malikussaleh University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v3i.204

Keywords:

STEAM, scientific, attitude, creative thinking

Abstract

Facing the development of 21st -century technology, students must be equipped with skills that help them become superior human resources, one of which is creative thinking skills. Creative thinking skills are the ability to analyze something based on data or information to generate new ideas in understanding something. One way to improve creative thinking skills is to train students to explore scientific attitudes and carry out learning that applies scientific activities such as STEAM learning (science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics). This study uses a quantitative research method Pre-Experimental Design. The design used is the One Group Pretest-Postest Design. The instruments used were twin observations during STEAM learning to assess creative thinking skills and questionnaires to assess scientific attitudes. The test used is a simple regression test that produces the equation Y=3.51+1.21X. Test the hypothesis using the t-test which concludes that there is a significant influence of scientific attitude on the creative thinking skills of students who apply STEAM learning.

References

E. Griffin, P., & Care, Assessment And Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Dodrecht: Springer Business Media, 2015.

S. Zubaidah, “Mengenal 4C: Learning and Innovation Skills Untuk Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” 2nd Sci. Educ. Natl. Conf., vol. 2, no. September, hal. 1–7, 2018.

H. Sakdiah, I. R. Lukman, dan M. Muliani, “Pelatihan Penggunaan Aplikasi Ispring Suite Dan Smart Apps Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Digital Bagi Guru Sd Di Lhokseumawe Pada Era New Normal,” J. Vokasi, vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 120, 2022, doi: 10.30811/vokasi.v6i2.3053.

P. R. Sasmita, H. Sakdiah, dan Z. Hartoyo, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (ILDs) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa,” Silampari J. Pendidik. Ilmu Fis., vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 55–65, 2020, doi: 10.31540/sjpif.v2i1.931.

R. H. Mardhiyah, S. N. F. Aldriani, F. Chitta, dan M. R. Zulfikar, “Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia,” Lect. J. Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, hal. 29–40, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813.

R. Vhalery, A. M. Setyastanto, dan A. W. Leksono, “Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: Sebuah Kajian Literatur,” Res. Dev. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, hal. 185, 2022, doi: 10.30998/rdje.v8i1.11718.

Y. Ismawati, A. Rahmah, M. N. Fathi, R. Jamaliyah, A. L. Rahmadani, dan N. Arfinanti, “Budaya Organisasi Sekolah Dalam Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Unggul,” Jurna Adm. dan Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 118–122, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um027v3i22020p118.

H. Sakdiah dan M. Jamilah, “Digital Literacy Students Facing To Independent Learning Independet Campus Curriculum,” Community Med. Educ. J., vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 217–222, 2022, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://www.hmpublisher.com/index.php/CMEJ/article/view/180/237

M. Suryaman, “Orientasi Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 2020, hal. 13–28.

Sunardi dan Hasanuddin, “Pengembangan Employability Skill Mahasiswa Vokasi Melalui Pembelajaran Stem-Project Based Learning,” SemanTECH, vol. 3, no. 4, hal. 210–217, 2019.

Overtoom, “Employability Skills: An Update,” 2000.

J. P. Robinson, “What are Employability Skills,” Alabama Coop. Ext. Syst., vol. 1, no. 3, hal. 1–3, 2000.

L. Widayoko, A., Latifah, E., & Yuliati, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Literasi Sains Siswa SMA dengan Bahan Ajar Terintegrasi STEM pada Materi Impuls dan Momentum,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 3, no. 11, hal. 1463–1467, 2018.

S. A. Britton, E. D., & Schneider, “Large-scale assessments in science education.,” in In Handbook of Research on Science Education., 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.

H. et al Fives, “Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students.,” Sci. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, hal. 549–580, 2014.

L. P. Marhaeni, A.A.I.N. & Artini, “Asesmen Autentik dan Pendidikan Bermakna: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 499–511, 2015.

L. R. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, “Student self-assessment. CA: Sage,” in J. H. McMillan (Ed.) The Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013, hal. 367–393.

S. Arikunto, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.

I. M. Suarta, N. S. Hardika, I. G. N. Sanjaya, dan I. W. B. Arjana, “Model Authentic Self-Assessment Dalam Pengembangan Employability Skills Mahasiswa Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 19, no. 1, hal. 46–57, 2015, doi: 10.21831/pep.v19i1.4555.

M. . Pellegrino, J.W., & Hilton, “Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century,” Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2012. http://www.nap.edu/catalog. php.

S. K. E. Novanti, E. Yulianti, dan V. R. Mustikasari, “Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Siswa Smp Materi Tekanan Zat Dan Penerapannya Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari,” J. Pembelajaran Sains, vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 7–12, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-17