Validity analysis of the mathematical literacy test: implementation of the pancasila student profiles in instrument development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.881Keywords:
Mathematical Literacy, Pancasila Student Profile, Instrument TestAbstract
The background to this research is based on the need to improve students' mathematical literacy skills, which are integrated with character formation based on Pancasila values. This research aims to analyze the validity of the mathematics literacy test implemented with the Pancasila student profile in developing test instruments. This research uses the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) development model, with a focus on validation of the instruments developed. The instrument consists of 20 questions that were validated by media experts, material experts, and language experts. The research results show that media validation, material validation, and language validation are in the very valid category. Of the 20 questions, 1 question item was declared valid in the very high category, 2 questions were valid in the high category, 14 questions were valid in the medium category, and 3 questions were valid in the low category. The reliability of the instrument is classified as high with a value of 0.783. Apart from that, 7 questions have good differentiating power, while 13 questions have sufficient differentiating power. Based on the level of difficulty, 4 questions are in the difficult criteria, 14 questions are in the medium criteria, and 4 questions are in the easy criteria. These results indicate that the mathematical literacy test instrument developed generally has good validity and reliability and can be used as an effective measuring tool in evaluating students' mathematical literacy abilities, as well as integrating the values of the Pancasila student profile.
References
[1] Moretti GA, Frandell T. Literacy from a Right to Education Perspective. Report of the Director General of UNESCO to the United Nations General Assembly 68th Session; 2013.
[2] Ningtiyas FA, Sinaga NA. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik. FRAKTAL: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 2022;3(2):9-15.
[3] Ojose B. Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able To Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education. 2018;4(1):89-100.
[4] Anisah A. Literasi matematika dalam kurikulum merdeka: Tantangan dan solusi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2022;7(1):67-75.
[5] Fitriani E. Peran literasi matematika dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan. 2020;2(3):155-162.
[6] Widyasari A, et al. Fenomena Learning Loss Sebagai Dampak Pendidikan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Best Journal: Biology Education Science and Technology. 2022;5(1):297-302.
[7] Feriyanto. Strategi Penguatan Literasi Numerasi Matematika Bagi Peserta Didik pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Gammath. 2022;7(2):86-94.
[8] Utari AR, dkk. Pemahaman Guru Matematika terhadap Assesmen Nasional pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 2023;11(2):30-40.
[9] Kurniawan A, Saputra S. Pengembangan instrumen tes literasi matematika di SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. 2022;18(1):45-53.
[10] Nasution A, Iskandar D. Pengembangan instrumen tes literasi matematika berbasis karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 2020;14(2):220-226.
[11] Irawati, et al. Profil Pelajar Pancasila Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Karakter Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan. 2022;6(1):24-38.
[12] Hidayati N. Desain instrumen asesmen literasi matematika untuk siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia. 2023;11(2):99-106.
[13] Sudarsono A. Meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi. 2023;5(2):77-85.
[14] Van de Walle JA, Karp KS, Bay-Williams JM. Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Pearson; 2020.
[15] Wibowo R, Hartono H. Pendekatan ADDIE dalam pengembangan instrumen asesmen pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. 2021;15(1):45-58.
[16] Rahmawati Y. Kualitas instrumen penilaian dalam pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. 2021;10(2):112-118.
[17] Setiawan D. Evaluasi instrumen penilaian literasi matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 2019;4(1):23-30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurul Afni Sinaga, Yulia Zahara, Zurra Yusally Aufa, Novilia Junianti Saragih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare https://proceedings.unimal.ac.id/micoms/index as the first party to publish the article.