Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Through Models of Problem Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.886Keywords:
problem based learning, problem solving, t test, educational assessment.Abstract
One of the aims of learning mathematics at school is to develop students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. This is in accordance with the objectives of mathematics learning in the independent curriculum set by the Curriculum and Educational Assessment Standards Agency. In the learning process using the Problem Based Learning model, students will be faced with various mathematical problems which are also related to daily life, so diligent and persistent efforts are needed from students to solve these various problems. This research is experimental research because the researcher applies a treatment to the research sample and then wants to know the effect of this treatment, namely in the form of increasing mathematical problem-solving abilities. The treatment given is learning using the Problem Based Learning model in the experimental class and conventional learning in the control class. The statistical test used to analyze data on increasing mathematical problem-solving abilities is the t* test. Based on the results of the t test, it was found that the sig value was 0.000 < 0.05 so that H0 was rejected, it could be concluded that the average mathematical problem-solving ability of students who receive learning through the problem based learning model is better than students who receive conventional learning.
References
[1] Ariawan, R., Utami, R., Herlina, S., & Istikomah, E. (2022). Pengembangan modul Ajar dengan Model Model Problem Based Learning BerorientasiKemampuan Pemecahan. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(01), 71- 82
[2] Hotimah, H. (2020).Penerapan Metode Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bercerita pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Edukasi, 7(3), 5-11
[3] Ramadhani, R. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika yang Berorientasi pada Model Problem Based Learning. KREANO, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 116–122
[4] BSKAP.(2022). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan Nomor 8 Kemendikbud.go.id
[5] Nizam. (2016). Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIIMSS,
INAP. Puspendik.
[6] OECD. (2019). Indonesia Students performance (PISA 2018). http://gpseducation.oecd.org
[7] Tantra, S. A. M., Widodo, S., & Katminingsih, Y. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education (RME).UNEJ E-Proceeding. https://jurnal.unej.ac,id/index.php/prosiding/article/view
[8] Irwanti, H., & Zetriuslita, Z. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berdasarkan Model Problem Based Learning Berorientasi Kemampuan PemecahanMasalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. JURING: Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning, 4(2), 103–112.
[9] Murni, A. (2019). Metakognisi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal PRINSIP Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 1-14
[10] Aklimawati &Mahmuzah, R. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jurnal Peluang, 6(2),
[11] Mahmuzah. R., & Aklimawati. (2018). Meningkatkan Disposisi Matematis Siswa SMP dengan Pendekatan Problem Posing. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 6(1), 1-7
[12] NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. Reston, VA NCTM.
[13] Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition (p.
253). Doubleday & Company, Inc.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref
[14] Wardhani, S & Rumiati, 2011. Instrumen Penilaian dan Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Jakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika Depdiknas.
[15] Romdoni, D. (2017). Analisis Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Pasundan Bandung
[16] Arikunto, S. (2000). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[17] Hake, R. (2002). Lessons from The Physics Education Reform Effort. Conservation Ecology
[18] Meltzer, & David, E. (2002). The Reactionship Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Am. J. Phys., 1259-1268
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yulia Zahara, Nurul Afni Sinaga, Rizka Suhaila, Zurra Yusally Aufa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication and this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
All articles in this journal may be disseminated by listing valid sources and the title of the article should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare https://proceedings.unimal.ac.id/micoms/index as the first party to publish the article.
