Science Process Skills Through The Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain And Create (Radec) Learning Model On Science Materials In High School

Authors

  • Sirry Alvina Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Syarifah Rita Zahara
  • Ayu Rahmi
  • Maulida Aufa Rofiki Lubis
  • Rahmah Nursada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.896

Keywords:

Science Process Skills,, RADEC, Pre-Experimental Design

Abstract

Natural Sciences (IPA) is a science related to nature that is systematically arranged through an investigation. The RADEC model as one of the solutions in the learning process that accommodates students to exchange information obtained and solve a problem. The purpose of this study is to implement the role of RADEC syntax in triggering student expertise in science process abilities (KPS). Increasing KPS requires the application of the RADEC Model to see the significance of increasing the use of the model, the measuring instrument used to measure KPS is a data collection instrument in the form of an observation sheet that has been prepared and then validated constructively (material experts). Sampling was carried out using convenience sampling, class sampling was carried out using a non-random technique which was then tested statistically as a basis for determining classes with the same abilities. The type of research conducted in this study is Pre-Experimental Design research. The posttest score of students' science process skills in the experimental class had the highest score of 96 and the lowest score of 78. While the posttest score in the control class had the highest score of 89 and the lowest score of 72. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 86 with a high category and in the control class was 80 with a very moderate category. The average score of students' science process skills in the experimental class was 81.66% with a moderate category. Students' science process skills in the Experimental class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 93.18% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 75.00%. Students' science process skills in the Control class obtained the highest percentage on the observing indicator of 86.36% and the lowest percentage on the making a hypothesis indicator of 61.36%.

References

[1]Agriyana, R. K., & Sopandi, W. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Read-Answer-Discuss_Explain-And Create (RADEC) Dan Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Materi Ekosistem Di Sekolah Dasar. 03, 117–126.

[2]Dito, S. B., & Pujiastuti, H. (2021). Dampak Revolusi Industri 4.0 Pada Sektor Pendidikan: Kajian Literatur Mengenai Digital Learning Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jurnal Sains Dan Edukasi Sains, 4(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v4i2p59-65

[3]Marwah Sholihah, & Nurrohmatul Amaliyah. (2022). Peran Guru Dalam Menerapkan Metode Diskusi Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(3), 898–905. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i3.2826

[4]Mellyzar, M., Alvina, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121

[5]Ningsi, A. P., & Nasih, R. (2020). Mendeskripsikan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Jambi Pada Metari Pembiasan Pada Lensa Cembung Dengan Menggunakan E-Modul. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran MIPA, 5(1), 1–9.

[6]Pohan, A. A., Abidin, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2020). Model Pembelajaran RADEC dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Siswa. Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa XIV, 496, 250–258.

[7]Pratama, Y. A., Sopandi, W., & Hidayah, Y. (2019). RADEC Learning Model (Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain And Create): The Importance of Building Critical Thinking Skills In Indonesian Context. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1379

[8]Riris Nurkholidah Rambe, Andini Syahfitri, Aini Humayroh, Nadila Alfina, Putri Azkia, & Tania Dwi Rianti. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara Di Depan Umum. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.1966

[9]Sa’baniyah, N., & Riyandari, B. A. (2022). Pengaruh Kombinasi Metode Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Dan Take and Give Terhadap Kemampuan Berkomunikasi Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X Sman 7 Mataram. Jurnal Kimia & Pendidikan Kimia, 4(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v4i2.5177

[10]Safitri, V., & Dafit, F. (2021). Peran Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Dan Menulis Melalui Gerakan Literasi Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1356–1364. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/938

[11]Setiya Rini, E. F., Darmaji, D., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2022). Identifikasi Kegiatan Praktikum dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains di SMPN Se-Kecamatan Bajubang. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 2476–2481. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2360

[12]Sri Wahyuni, Khaerudin, A. H. (2022). Perbandingan Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Radec Dan Discovery Learning Siswa Kelas V Upt Spf Sdn Parang Comparison of Science Process Skills and Science Learning Outcomes Through the Radec Learning Model and D. Jurnal EduTech, 8(2), 146–155.

[13]Sugiyono. (2016). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research.

[14]Suharyat, Y., Satria, E., Santosa, T. A., & Amalia, K. N. (2022). Meta-Analisis Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Abad-21 Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(5), 5081–5088.

[15]Suryaningsih, S., & Ainun Nisa, F. (2021). Kontribusi STEAM Project Based Learning dalam Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(6), 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.36418/japendi.v2i6.198

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18