Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy Abilities on Science Learning in High School

Authors

  • Ayu Rahmi Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Syarifah Rita Zahara
  • Sirry Alvina
  • M. Ridwan Fadli
  • Eka Juliana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.897

Keywords:

literacy ability, science literacy, science

Abstract

The world of education plays an important role in civilization and the mobility of future generations. However, there are still weaknesses in the learning process, especially in methods that are monotonous and rely on memorization, which results in students having difficulty relating learning to real contexts. Science learning in schools emphasizes results, while the process is often neglected. Scientific literacy, which includes content, context, competencies and attitudes, is the focus of this research to improve students' scientific literacy abilities at the high school level. Data from the Program for International Students Assessment (PISA) shows that scientific literacy in Indonesia is still low. This research aims to analyze students' scientific literacy profiles. Data collection was carried out through scientific literacy questions that were validated constructively and empirically. The scientific literacy indicators measured include 1) Identifying valid scientific opinions; 2) Understanding of research design elements and their influence on findings; 3) Ability to complete tests or questions related to scientific phenomena; 4) Understanding and interpreting basic statistics; 5) Ability to draw conclusions, observe and make decisions based on data. Students' scientific literacy abilities are divided into very good, good, sufficient and poor categories. Based on the research results, it was found that the percentage of students in the very good category was 27.08%, in the good category was 31.25%, in the fair category was 36.45%, and in the low category was 5.20%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the highest percentage describing students' scientific literacy abilities is at sufficient criteria. Therefore, it is important to increase students' scientific literacy.

References

[1] Alvina, S., Mellyzar, M., Zahara, S. R., Masrina, M., & Afrianti, S. (2022). The Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Journal of Science Education Research, (Lhokseumawe) pp 8(4), 1907-1915.

[2] Fatimah, S., Mufti, Y., & Mahmudah, U. (2021). Analysis of the Needs for Android Application Development Based on Local Potential as a Science Learning Media. In Proceedings of SEMAI: PGMI National Seminar,, (Indonesia) (Vol. 1, pp. 224–237).

[3] Fitriani, H., Mellyzar, M., & Rahmi, A. (2022). Science Process Skills Structure and Activity of Inorganic Compounds Reviewing from Knowledge of Prospective Chemistry Teachers. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, (Lhokseumawe) pp 4(2), 130-135.

[4] Inggrid Ayu Amala, & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analysis of Science Literacy and Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students on Additive and Addictive Substance Material. Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, (Indonesia) pp 12(2), 373–378

[5] Mellyzar, M., Alvina, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Journal of Science Education Research, (Lhokseumawe) pp 8(4), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121

[6] Mellyzar, M., Lukman, I. R., Alvina, S., Pasaribu, A. I., & Fadli, M. R. (2022). Chemical Literacy of High School Students: Analysis of Cognitive Abilities on Colloid Material. Journal of Science Education Research, (Lhokseumawe) pp 8(6), 3128–3133.

[7] Mellyzar, M., Zahara, S. R., & Alvina, S. (2022). Science Literacy in Science Learning for Junior High School Students. Pendekar: Journal of Character Education, (Lhokseumawe) pp 5(2), 119124.

[8] Mellyzar, M., Rahmi, A., & Fitriani, H. (2023, March). Science Process Skills of Pre-service Teacher Through Inorganic Chemistry Practicum Activities. In Mathematics and Science Education International Seminar 2021 (MASEIS 2021) (Lhokseumawe) (Vol. 718, p. 171). Springer Nature.

[9] OECD. 2003. The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework-Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. (Paris)

[10] OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. (Paris): OECD Publishing.

[11] OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.(Paris)

[12] Pratama, R., Alamsyah, M., Siburian, M. F., Marhento, G., Jonathan, G. L., & Susanti, W. (2024). Analysis of Students' Science Literacy Ability in Science Subjects. Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, (Indonesia) pp 14(02), 576–581.

[13] Rahmi, A. (2018). Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Learning Model on Chemistry Kinetics Materials.(Lhokseumawe) pp 1(1), 44–49.

[14] Rahmi, A., Fitriani, H., & Mellyzar, M. (2022). Science Process Skills Structure and Activity of Inorganic Compounds Reviewing from Knowledge of Prospective Chemistry Teachers. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, (Lhokseumawe) p 4(2), 130.

[15] Rita Zahara, S., Alvina, S., & Abstract Article, I. (2022). Science Literacy In Science Learning For Junior High School Students. Journal of Character Education, (Lhokseumawe) pp 5(2), 119–124

[16] Riyad. 2022. Science Literacy. (Bangka Belitung): Archives and Library Service.

[17] Sentosa, r& Norsandi, D. (2022). The Effective Learning Models in The New Normal Era. Journal of Education, (Kalimantan) pp 23(2), 125–139.

[18] Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What Does this mean to scientists and school teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, (America) pp 83(10), 1557.

[19] Sugiyono. (2016). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research. (Bandung)

[20] Suparya, I. K. ., I Wayan Suastra, & Putu Arnyana, I. B. (2022). Low Science Literacy: Causative Factors and Alternative Solutions. Scientific Journal of Education Citra Bakti, (Indonesia) pp 9(1), 153–166

[21] Toharuddin, Uus et al. 2011. Building Students' Science Literacy. (Bandung): Humanities.

[22] Zahara, S., Alvina, S., & Abstract Article, I. (2022). Science Literacy in Science Learning for Junior High School Students . Journal of Character Education, (Lhokseumawe) pp 5(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.31764.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18