Challenges And Needs In Integrating Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs) Into High School Physics Curriculum: A Study In Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Authors

  • Widya Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/micoms.v4i.959

Abstract

This study examines the challenges and needs faced by high school physics teachers in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia, regarding the integration of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into their curriculum. A cross-sectional survey using a Likert-scale questionnaire was administered to 11 physics teachers to gather data on key barriers such as time constraints, availability of teaching materials, teachers’ understanding of SDGs, facility needs, training requirements, and school policy support. The results reveal that time constraints are perceived as a moderate barrier, with 36.36% of teachers reporting occasional difficulty in managing both the physics curriculum and SDG integration. A significant challenge is the limited availability of teaching materials related to SDGs, as 45.45% of teachers indicated a lack of resources to effectively teach these topics. Teachers also expressed a moderate level of difficulty in understanding SDGs, with 36.36% identifying this as a challenge in their teaching. The study highlighted the strong need for training on SDG concepts, with 45.45% of teachers strongly agreeing on the importance of professional development. Adequate facilities for teaching SDGs were less of an issue, as 36.36% of teachers reported that sufficient facilities were available. Finally, while some school policy support exists, 36.36% of teachers noted that policy alignment with SDG integration is still insufficient. These findings emphasize the need for targeted professional development programs, better teaching resources, and stronger policy support to facilitate the integration of SDGs in high school physics education.

References

[1] H. Y. Pratiwi, S. D. Aji, A. R. Hakim, C. Sundaygara, A. Gurtin, and M. N. Hudha, “E-Module of Physics Science Integrated with Sustainable Development Goals to Enhance Students’ Environmental Literacy,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 128, 2023, doi: 10.20527/jipf.v7i1.6844.

[2] T. Meda, “Analisis Potensi RPP Education for Sustainable Development pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA,” Ideguru J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 344–352, 2022, doi: 10.51169/ideguru.v7i3.446.

[3] M. J. Sá, A. I. Santos, S. Serpa, and C. M. Ferreira, “Digital Literacy in Digital Society 5.0: Some Challenges,” Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.36941/ajis-2021-0033.

[4] Khaidir Fadil, Noor Isna Alfaien, and Ahmad Mulyadi Kosim, “Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Indonesia Dalam Mewujudkan Program Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs),” Edupedia J. Stud. Pendidik. dan Pedagog. Islam, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2023, doi: 10.35316/edupedia.v7i2.2513.

[5] W. Widya, Y. Yusmanila, Z. Zaturrahmi, and K. Ikhwan, “Praktikalitas E-Module Berbasis Model Creative Problem Solving (CPS) untuk Materi Fluida Dinamis Terintegrasi Keterampilan Abad 21,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 5700–5707, 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3313.

[6] N. M. Setyorini and A. Q. Asmonah, “Pendidikan Sebagai Langkah Awal Mencapai Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di Indonesia,” AICCII – Annu. Int. Conf. Islam. Sci. Integr. 2023, pp. 141–149, 2023.

[7] S. R. Zahara, M. Muliani, and R. Rizaldi, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dicovery Learning dan Model Pembelajaran PBL terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa,” Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–23, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.29103/RELATIVITAS.V4I1.3805.

[8] R. Makaramani, “21st Century Learning Design for a Telecollaboration Project,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 191, pp. 622–627, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.567.

[9] R. Rahimah, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru Smp Negeri 10 Kota Tebingtinggi Dalam Menyusun Modul Ajar Kurikulum Merdeka Melalui Kegiatan Pendampingan Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022,” ANSIRU PAI Pengemb. Profesi Guru Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 92, 2022, doi: 10.30821/ansiru.v6i1.12537.

[10] M. Håkansson, D. O. O. Kronlid, and L. Östman, “Searching for the political dimension in education for sustainable development: socially critical, social learning and radical democratic approaches,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 6–32, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1408056.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20