Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Communal Intellectual Property In Improving Aceh's Economy

Authors

  • Yulia Yulia Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Yusrizal Hasbi Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Ferdy Saputra Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Jamaluddin Jamaluddin Universitas Malikussaleh

Keywords:

Protection, Traditional Knowledge, Economy, Aceh

Abstract

Traditional knowledge is one of the communal intellectual property owned by the Acehnese people. Article 8(j) of the CBD has emphasized the recognition of knowledge, innovations, and practices of indigenous peoples and local communities related to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Then in the Nagoya Protocol, it is emphasized on the protection of traditional knowledge through access and benefit sharing. Indonesia has ratified both agreements in protecting traditional knowledge as communal intellectual property. The IGC GRTKF Agreement in May 2024 in Geneva sets out clearer guidelines on the commercialization of traditional knowledge must be shared with the community of origin, either in the form of royalties, profit sharing, or other forms. WIPO also introduced a traditional knowledge registration system to assist communities in documenting and protecting their knowledge. Indonesia has ratified Government Regulation Number 56 of 2022 concerning the Registration of Communal Intellectual Property. This article examines the importance of protecting traditional knowledge as part of communal intellectual property in improving the economy of Aceh. This research is an empirical legal research using primary and secondary data. The results of this study indicate that Aceh has great potential for traditional knowledge that supports the regional economy. In terms of regulation, Indonesia already has sufficient rules in order to protect traditional knowledge of the community. The use of traditional knowledge of the community must share benefits with the community. Data collection and registration of traditional knowledge can also be a comparative document in patent registration applications. However, this opportunity has not been utilized optimally. Aceh has not conducted data collection and registration of traditional knowledge as a form of legal protection of traditional knowledge. This means that by not conducting data collection and registration of traditional knowledge of the Aceh community, it can eliminate opportunities to improve the regional economy.

Author Biographies

Yulia Yulia, Universitas Malikussaleh

faculty of Law

Yusrizal Hasbi, Universitas Malikussaleh

Faculty of Law

Ferdy Saputra, Universitas Malikussaleh

Faculty of Law

Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, Universitas Malikussaleh

Faculty of Law

References

Ayu Palar, Miranda Risang, Laina Rafianti, and Helitha Novianty Muchtar. “Inclusive Rights to Protect Communal Intellectual Property: Indonesian Perspective on Its New Government Regulation.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2274431.

Ceriana, R, and D S Shinta. “Studi Pemanfaatan Tumbuhan Berkhasiat Obat Di Kecamatan Lhoksukon Kabupaten Aceh Utara.” Health and Contemporary … 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–4. https://ejurnal.seminar-id.com/index.php/hytech/article/view/87.

Dutfield, Graham, and Uma Suthersanen. “Traditional Knowledge as Intellectual Property Subject Matter: Perspectives from History, Anthropology, and Diverse Economies.” SSRN Electronic Journal, no. 418 (2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4709231.

Fitri, Rahma; candra irawan. “Legal Reform through Strengthening Protection of Communal Itellectual Property in the Enggano Community in Bengkulu Province.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 4, no. 2 (2023): 271–84.

Hairumini, Dewi Liesnoor Setyowati, and Tjaturahono Budi Sanjoto. “Kearifan Lokal Rumah Tradisional Aceh Sebagai Warisan Budaya Untuk Mitigasi Bencana Gempa Dan Tsunami.” Journal of Educational Social Studies 6, no. 1 (2017): 37–44. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jess.

Hananto, Pulung Widhi Hari, and Rahandy Rizki Prananda. “THE URGENCY OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION AS A LEGAL PROTECTION INSTRUMENT TOWARD TRADITIONALKNOWLEDGE IN INDONESIA.” Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 15, no. 1 (March 29, 2019): 62–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23355.

Irawan, Candra. “Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective on Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia.” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 20, no. 2 (2017): 57–67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jwip.12073.

Ismayana, Dr., and Nurul Chamidah. “The Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights On Local-Wisdom Based Crafts In A Tourism Village In Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia” 136, no. Icosop 2017 (2018): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosop-17.2018.47.

Mardhiah, Ria Ervilita; Ainun. “Analisis Pengobatan Tradisional Masyarakat Aceh Jaya Dari Bahan Alam Sebagai Bentuk Kearifan Lokal Dalam Meningkatkan Pengetahuan Siswa Ria.” Jurnal Serambi Ilmu 4, no. 2 (2023): 143–56.

Mawardi, Surip. “Advantages, Constraints and Key Success Factors in Establishing Origin- and Tradition-Linked Quality Signs: The Case of Kompong Speu Palm Sugar Geographical Indication, Cambodia.” The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), no. May (2009).

Prabowo, Gunarto Nanang, and Muchammad Iksan. “Legal Protection of Patients in Traditional Medicine in the City of Surakarta According to Act No . 8 of 1999” 12, no. 6 (2024): 521–29.

Salfiyadi, Teuku. “PENGETAHUAN PENGGUNAAN OBAT TRADISIONAL DALAM PERAWATAN KNOWLEDGE OF THE USE OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE IN DENTAL HEALTH CARE IN.” JDHT Journal of Dental Hygiene and Therapy 4, no. 1 (2023): 70–75. https://doi.org/10.36082/jdht.v4i1.974.

Sari, Ellieka, and Runtung Sitepu. “Legal Protection of Oukup Karo Treatment as a Form of Communal Intellectual Property Rights,” no. Cesit 2020 (2021): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010294600570063.

Wulandari, Fenny. “Protection of Communal Intellectual Property Rights Through Geographical Indication System.” Veteran Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 115–34.

Yulia, Mrs., and Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol. “Melindungi Keanekaragaman Hayati Dalam Kerangka Protokol Nagoya.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 25, no. 2 (2014): 271. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16084.

Yulia, Yulia. “THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE UNDER INDONESIAN PATENT LAW: BETWEEN OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 18, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.3.815.

———. “The Urgency of Protecting Traditional Knowledge of Medicines as Communal Intellectual Property of the Aceh Community Urgensi Perlindungan Pengetahuan Obat Tradisional Sebagai Kekayaan Komunal Masyarakat Aceh.” Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin (Multidiciplinary Research 6, no. 2 (2023): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.52626/jg.v.

Yulia, Yulia, Malahayati Rahman, Herinawati Herinawati, and Novita Novita. “Legal Protection of Traditional Medicine Knowledge as Intellectual Property of North Aceh Communities.” Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 13, no. 4 (2024): 407–21. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2023.04.02.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31