Analysis of Disputes Related to Defaults in Debt and Receivable Agreements
Keywords:
Law, Default, Debts, Guarante, CertificateAbstract
The purpose is to find out and analyze the judge's considerations in making decisions regarding cases of default in debt and receivable agreements and to know and understand the responsibilities of debtors in default in debt and receivable agreements. How do judges consider when deciding cases of default in debt and receivable agreements? The aim is to find out and analyze the judge's considerations in making decisions regarding cases of default in debt and receivable agreements. as well as knowing and understanding the debtor's responsibility for defaulting in the debt and receivable agreement. The research method aims to study one or more symptoms by analyzing them and by conducting in-depth fact checks. This research is included in normative legal research. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal law. This research was conceptualized as written in statutory regulations. Considering, that of all the arguments of the Plaintiff's lawsuit and the arguments of the Defendant's denial, according to the Panel of Judges the main issue in this case is "whether the Defendant's actions relating to the agreement to the Plaintiff constitute a breach of contract or not." In connection with the analysis of the judge's considerations regarding the petitum granted in decision Number 53/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Pms, namely regarding the conditions for the validity of an agreement in Article 1320 and Article 1321 of the Civil Code.
References
Bachtiar, B., & Sumarna, Pembebanan Tanggung Jawab Perdata Kepada Kepala Daerah Akibat Wanprestasi Oleh Kepala Dinas, Jurnal Yudisial, 2018.
Marpaung, J. A., Lawolo, O., & Siregar, S. A. . Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Hutang Piutang (Studi Putusan No. 620/PDT. G/2019/PN. MDN). Jurnal Rectum, 2022.
M. Yahya Harahap, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Bandung,1986.
Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2004.
Nisrin, L, Analisi Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perkara Utang Piutang (Studi Putusan No.: 6/PDT. G/2021/PN GDT), Jurnallsth, 2022.
Salim H.S, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis, Jakarta: Rajawali Pres, 2008.
Soerjono Soekonto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI-Press, Jakarta, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tata Nindya Putri, Nurarafah Nurarafah, Sofyan Jafar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the proceeding the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources, and the article's title should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare the Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) as the first party to publish the article.
