Legal Consequences Of The Revocation Of Complaints In Domestic Violence Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v2i.129Keywords:
evocation Complaint, Domestic Violence CrimeAbstract
According to Article 1 paragraph (1) of the UUPKDRT domestic violence is any act against a person, especially a woman, which results in the emergence of misery or suffering within the scope of the household. Domestic violence is commonly referred to as a hidden crime that has taken many victims from all walks of life. Some forms of criminal acts regulated in the UUPKDRT are complaints. Complaints are the right of the victim to be prosecuted or not to be prosecuted because it concerns the interests of the victim. Thepurpose of the complaint is to protect the aggrieved party and provide an opportunity for interested parties to resolve the case in force in society. Theproblem that was studied was how to protect the law for victims of domestic violence and how the legal consequences of retracting reports by victims of domestic violence crimes. This research uses normative legal research methods. The approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Protection of victims is any effort aimed at providing a sense of security to the victim carried out by the family, advocates, social institutions, police, prosecutors, courts, or other parties either temporarily or based on court determinations. To optimize the protection of victims, restitution needs to be integrated into the criminal justice system. Considering that restitution is a criminal institution that can provide benefits to victims, perpetrators, the state, and society. In addition to restitution, compensation can also be given to victims of domestic violence as an effort to protect the law. In the formulation of the 2008 Criminal Code Bill in Article 135 of the Criminal Code Bill, it is also formulated about the protection of victims of domestic violence, the legal consequences caused if the complaint is revoked, the prosecution becomes void. The revocation of the complaint on the complaint is an absolute requirement for non-prosecution. However, if the revocation of the complaint does not meet the provisions in accordance with Article 75 of the Criminal Code, then the revocation of the complaint cannot stop the criminal case.
References
Angkasa, “Kedudukan Korban DalamSistemPeradilanPidana”, Disertasi, Program DoktorIlmu Hukum UNDIP Semarang, 2003, pp. 244.
Shinta, AnalisisTerhadap Lembaga Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi yang BerdayadalamUndang-UndangNomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentangPerlindunganSaksi dan Korban, “Jurnal Hukum dan Republika”. Vo.7, No.1, Tahun 2007, pp 27-23.
Dalam Ayu Setyaningrum dan Ridwan Arifin. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jim.v3i1.2019.9-19
Ayu Setyaningrum dan Ridwan Arifin, AnalisisUpayaPerlindungan dan PemulihanTerhadap Korban KekerasanDalamRumahTangga (KDRT) Khususnya Anak-Anak dan Perempuan, “Muqoddimah”, Vol 3, No.1, Februari 2019, pp.15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jim.v3i1.2019.9-19
Chazawi, Adami, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2, PT Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta, 2005.
pp.43
Eva Achjani, Gugurnya Hak Menuntut, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2010, pp.11.
Muhammad Satria, Zainal Asikin dan Ufran. Peran
PenyidikdalamUpayaPenyelesaianTindakPidanaKekerasanDalamRumahTangga
(KDRT) Secara Restorative Justice (StudiPolrestaMataram). “Open Jurnal System”
Vol.14 No.5 Desember 2019. Pp. 2683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v14i5.394
WizaenadiLaksono, Syaiful Asmi Hasibuan, FitriaRamadhaniSiregar. Penerapan Tingkat
PenyidikanTindakPidanaKekerasanDalamRumahTangga. “Jurnal Rectum”, Vol.4, No.2, Juli 2022. pp. 551. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i2.2092
HamidahAbdurrachman, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban KekerasanDalamRumahTanggaDalamPutusanPengadilan Negeri
SebagaiImplementasiHak-Hak Korban, “Jurnal Hukum”, Vol.17, No.3, Juli 2010, pp. 484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss3.art7
Mudjiati, “ImplementasiUndang-UndangNomor 23 Tahun 2004
TentangPenghapusanKekerasanDalamRumahTanggaSuatuTantanganMenujuSiste m Hukum Yang Responsif Gender”,JurnalLegislasi Indonesia, Vol. 5, No. 3 September
, pp. 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v5i3.297
RUU KitabUndang-Undang Hukum Pidana, DirektoratJenderalPeraturanPerundangundangan,Departemen Hukum dan HakAsasiManusia, 2008
Samidjo, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Armico, Bandung, 1985, pp 154.
SatochidKartanegara, Hukum Pidana Kumpulan Kuliah Bagian II, BalaiLekturMahasiswa, Bandung ,tt, pp.165
E Utrecht, Hukum Pidana II, Pustaka Tinta Mas, Surabaya, 2000, pp 257
M. Iqbal Ali Bazhar, “TinjauanYuridisPencabutanLaporanKepolisianDalamTindakPidana”
Thesis, Universitas Wiraraja, 2021. pp. 2
http://repository.wiraraja.ac.id/id/eprint/1372
R. Soesilo, Pokok-pokok Hukum PidanaPeraturanUmum dan Delik-delikKhusus, Bandung, 1948, pp. 94
Y. Arafah, PenyelesaianPerkaraDelikAduanDenganPerspektif Restorative Justice,”Borneo
Law Review” Vol.1, No.2, Desember 2017. Pp.128. DOI. https://doi.org/10.35334/bolrev.v1i2.714
S. Soerodibroto, KUHP dan KUHAP dilengkapiYurisprudensiMahkamahAgung dan Hoge Raad, RajaGrapindoPersada, Jakarta, 1991, pp. 403.
M. Yusuf Siregar, dkk, AnalisisPutusan Hakim
PengadilanPidanaTerhadapPencabutanPerkaraDelikAduan
(StudiPutusanMahkamah Agung No.1600K/PID/2009),“USU Law Journal”,Vol,I.II, No.1, Februari 2014, pp.192
Dwi Ratna Kamala Sari Lukman, Pencabutan Pengaduan dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan
Dalam Rumah Tangga, “Widya Karta” Vo.2, No.2, November 2019, pp. 97-98
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Shira Thani, Fitria Mardhatillah, Eko Gani PG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the proceeding the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources, and the article's title should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare the Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) as the first party to publish the article.
