Legal Analysis and Socio-Economic Implication Post-Trade Dispute Decision between Indonesia-Brazil in the World Trade Organization (WTO)

Authors

  • Muksalmina Muksalmina Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Hera Susanti Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Muhammad Iqbal Universitas Abulyatama
  • Eko Gani PG Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Muammar Muammar Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v3i-.405

Keywords:

International Trade, WTO, DSB, Import

Abstract

Indonesia participates actively in international trade and is a member country of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In this case, Indonesia made regulations regarding guarantees for halal products, this became an obstacle to importing Brazilian chicken meat. Because of that, Brazil suffered a loss and sued Indonesia for restricting trade. The regulation is also considered to violate existing WTO policies. Dispute settlement is carried out by an institution under the auspices of the WTO, namely the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). In its decision, Indonesia was declared guilty and violated the provisions in force at the WTO. The result of the lawsuit decision is that Indonesia must revise regulations related to inhibiting the entry of chicken meat products from Brazil. If Indonesia does not ratify or does not want to adjust its regulations regarding the import and export of goods, there will be sanctions that will have a major impact on Indonesia's international relations.

References

Ade Maman S. “Dispute Settlement Body – WTO dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdagangan internasional”, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 2012.

Fahmi Fairuzzaman. “Dampak Penerapan Agreement on The Application Of Sanitary And Phytosanitary Measures Terhadap Perdagangan di Indonesia”, Renaissance, Vol.3, No 2, Hal 325, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art5

Gunawan Y. Hukum Internasional: Sebuah Pendekatan Modern, Yogyakarta, LP3M UMY, 2021.

Hata. Perdagangan Internasional dalam Sistem GATT dan WTO Aspek-Aspek Hukum dan Non Hukum, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2006.

Maghfirah, F., Thani, S., Mardhatillah, F., & PG, E. G. (2022). Sosialisasi Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah dan Strategi Publikasi. Wisanggeni: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 74-81.

Muhammad Taufik H. “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Sengketa Impor Daging Ayam Antara Brazil dan Indonesia Tahun 2014 Melalui Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) World Trade Organization (WTO)”, Universitas Bung Hatta, 2014.

Muksalmina, M. H. BAB 4 KAJIAN PUSTAKA & KERANGKA TEORITIS PENELITIAN HUKUM. METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM, 37.

Muksalmina, M., Tasyukur, T., Maghfirah, F., & Muammar, M. (2022, December). Halal Certification In A Food Product As An Effort To Protect Law Against Muslim Consumers In Indonesia. In Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 00008-00008). https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v2i.78

Muksalmina, M., Faisal, F., & Susanti, H. (2023). Kajian Dasar Hukum bagi Teknologi Finansial sebagai Penunjang Ekonomi Internasional. Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(1), 140-146.

PG, E. G. (2023). Implementasi Qanun Aceh No. 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Sistem Jaminan Produk Halal bagi jasa Katering di Kota Lhokseumawe. JAKTABANGUN: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pembangunan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.56857/jaktabangun.v9i2.157

Rifai, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., ... & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Banten: Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Serlika Aprita, Rio Adhitya. Hukum Perdagangan Internasional, Cet. 9. Depok, Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30