Criminal Act Of Experiment Trafficking In Persons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v2i.90Keywords:
Criminal Liabillity, Judge's Consideration, Trial, Trafficking in PersonAbstract
The crime of trafficking in persons is something that has often happened that cannot be denied. So that this matter became a special concern for the Government of Indonesia, which in the end issued the regulation of Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Criminal Acts of Trafficking in Persons. The main problem in this research is criminal liability for the attempted criminal act of trafficking in persons and the judge's consideration in sentencing the perpetrators who attempted the criminal act of trafficking in persons in the decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Lsm. This type of research is included in the normative juridical law research group. Meanwhile, judging from its nature, this research is a complete, detailed, and clear description of a reality. Criminal liability for attempted criminal acts of trafficking in persons in Law Number 21 of 2017 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons is different from liability for attempted criminal acts regulated in the Criminal Code. The difference is that in Article 53 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code the sentence imposed is reduced by one third, while according to Article 10 of Law Number 21 of 2017 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the criminal sanctions imposed are not reduced by one third, but are equated with the deed is done. The judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on the attempted criminal act of trafficking in persons in the decision Number 54/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Lsm is based on evidence, testimony of witnesses, testimony of the defendant and based on the facts revealed in the trial and also consider the aggravating reasons and mitigating reasons from the defendant, and with the judge's conviction, the verdict handed down in this case is a prison sentence of 3 (three) years and a fine of Rp.120,000,000, - so that the judge's consideration in The author considers that the sentence is appropriate because it is appropriate and fulfills these elements. It is recommended that the criminal liability imposed can provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Judges in making decisions are expected to consider everything presented in the trial, in addition to juridical considerations, judges are also expected to carry out non-juridical considerations.
References
Al Vishnu Broto. 1997. Law and Judicial in Indonesia deep Some Aspects Study University
Atma victory Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta. Pp. 37.
Article 1 number (2) Law Number 21 Year 2007 Eradication Follow Punishment Trade
Person.
Bagir Manan. 1995. Authority Justice Republic Indonesian LPPM-UNISBA: Bandung. Pp. 12.
Chairul Badriah. 2005. Rules Trafficking Law (Women and Children) Bandung Erlangga. Pp.
Chairul Huda. 2006. From No Punishment Without Error Towards To No Accountability
Punishment Without Error. Gold, Jakarta. Pp. 70.
Dwijda Priyatno. 2004. Policy Legislation About System Accountability Punishment
Corporation in Indonesia, Cv Utomo. Bandung. Pp. 30.
Embassy Big and Consulate U.S. in Indonesia, 2021, Annual ReportTrading PeopleYear,
<https://id.usembassy.gov/id/our-relationship-id/official-reports-id/laporan-tahunan-perdagangan-orang-2021/>, Access on 23 February 2022 hit 3:40 p.m.
Guide Writing Assignment End. 2015-2016. Faculty University Law Malikussaleh
Lhokseumawe. hlm. 108.
Leden Marpaung. 2005. Foundation, Theory, Practice Law Punishment. Light Grafika.
Jakarta. Pp. 14.
Mahrus Ali and Wind Aji Pace. 2011. Trade Person: Dimension, Instruments International
And Setting In Indonesia, Bandung, Citra Aditya Filial Piety. Pp. 1.
Margaritha V, Alhabsie et al,. 2021. Legal Studies About Obey And Do Follow Punishment
Murder (Delneming) According to Article 55 and 56 of the Criminal Code, Journal Lex Crimen. Pp. 19.
Nurhenny, H. 2010. Follow Punishment Trade Person Policy Law Punishment and Prevention,
Light Grafika. Jakarta. Pp. 30.
Republic Indonesian Invite-Invite Basis Year 1945, Article 1, Amendment Iv.
Verdict Court Country Lhokseumawe Number 54/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Ngo, Date April 22,
Zaki Mubarak and Hendra Gunawan (editor), Rohingya Young Women Targeted Trade
People in Aceh, TP Paid Rp 1 Million 'Kidnap' 3 Girls, Serambi.com, 2020. https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2020/10/15/wanita-muda-pengungsi-rohingya-jadi-target trade-people-in-Aceh-one-doer-secured. Access date 23 February 2022 hit 6:14 p.m.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Anika Ade Lasna, Husni Husni, Yusrizal Yusrizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the proceeding the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows others to share work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this proceeding.
All articles in this proceeding may be disseminated by listing valid sources, and the article's title should not be omitted. The content of the article is liable to the author.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this proceeding.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
In the dissemination of articles, the author must declare the Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS) as the first party to publish the article.
