Paradigm of the Treatment of the Prophet's Mosque and the Current Mosque Through the Interpretation of Architectural Space in Social Reproduction
Keywords:
paradigm, structuration, BKM (Institution of Mosque), social reproductionAbstract
From practical research, there are several references in academic ideas that contain thoughts to re-evaluate the shift in the treatment of mosques today compared to the Prophet's Mosque. The existence of mosques today practically prioritizes the provision of spiritual worship space capacity compared to social worship. So the architecture of the mosque as a place of worship that balances the relationship between humans and their God and the relationship between humans and humans is questioned. BKM as a generator of social reproduction of religious organizations that regulate the reality of mosque activities to improve the quality of the community becomes the object of analysis of architectural studies as the cause of the shift in treatment. Therefore, research was conducted through reference data from the Current Mosque and the Prophet's Mosque to analyze their performance through the idea of structuring in order to reveal the problem of the paradigm shift in the treatment of the Current Mosque. The dialectic of BKM performance is used to test the extent to which the treatment of the Mosque adapts fantasy and fantastic ideas in the realm of architecture. The current mosque is more oriented towards social reproduction that strengthens activities over the relationship between humans and God, while the Prophet's Mosque in social reproduction has a balance to strengthen activities over the relationship between humans and God and the relationship between humans and humans.
References
A. Giddens. (1984). The Constitution of the Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow, 13(1).
A. Perez-Gomez. (1996). CHORA: Intervals in the Philosophy of Architecture (Alberto Perez-Gomez, Ed.; Vol. 1). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
A. Rifa’i. (2016). Revitalisasi Fungsi Masjid Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Modern. Universum, 10(2), 155–163.
A. Sapian. R., M. Ismail. N, M. Rashid, & W. Rani. (2018). Mosque: A statement of citizenship. Planning Malaysia, 16(1), 96–104.
Aliza Azzahra, Deni, & Dela Andriani. (2022). MEMAHAMI ISLAMIC CENTER KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE MELALUI GENIUS LOCI. Rumoh: Journal of Architecture, 12(2).
Antony Bryant. (2017). Grounded Theory and Grounded Theorizing, PRAGMATISM IN RESEARCH PRACTICE. . Oxford University Press.
D. Dalmeri. (2014). Revitalisasi Fungsi Masjid sebagai Pusat Ekonomi dan Dakwah Multikultural. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 22(2), 321–350.
D. Wahyudiana. (2002). Memfungsikan Masjid Sebagai Pusat Pendidikan Untuk Membentuk Peradaban Islam. Islamadina, 13(2), 1–13.
Deni, B. Karsono., R. Mirsa, A. Safyan, & E. Saputra. (2021). The Divergence Between Prophet’s Masjid and Present Masjid: An Architectural Essay. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 1(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i2.136
E. Ayyad. S. (2013). The “House of the prophet” or the “mosque of the prophet”? . The “House of the Prophet” or the “Mosque of the Prophet”?, 24(3), 273–334.
E. Becker. (2017). Good Mosque, Bad Mosque: Boundaries to Belonging in Contemporary Germany. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 85(4), 1050–1088.
H. Al-Qahtany. M. (2009). Islamic architecture as a reflection of functionalism and interactionism: conceptual origins in culture and sociology. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 2(3), 435–457.
H. Lastuti. (2017). Peran Badan Kemakmuran Masjid (BKM) Dalam Membina sikap Keagamaan Remaja di Gampong Lampulo Kota Banda Aceh. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
J. Erzen. N. (2011). Reading mosques: Meaning and architecture in Islam. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 69(1), 135–131.
Luckmann, Peter L, & Berger, T. (1991). The social construction of “religion” and its limits: A critical reading of Timothy Fitzgerald (6th ed., Vol. 24). Penguin Books.
M. Mughal. A. Z. (2015). An anthropological perspective on the mosque in Pakistan. Asian Anthropology, 14(2), 166–181.
M. Muslih. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu:Kajian Atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan (M. S. Prof. Dr. H. Kaelan, Ed.).
N. Baharudin, ’Athiqah, & A. Ismail. S. (2014). Communal Mosques: Design Functionality towards the Development of Sustainability for Community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 106–120.
Rizki Alamsyah, Deni, & Yenni Novianty. (2022). Dualitas Masjid Baiturrahman Kota Lhokseumawe: Kajian Pragmatis Arsitektur. Seminar Nasional Fakultas Teknik Universitas Malikussaleh, 1(1), 135–146.
Santy. (2019). Pola komunikasi Badan Kenaziran Masjid (BKM) Agung At-Taqwa Kutacane menuju Icon Wisata di Aceh Tenggara. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara.
Shafiyyurrahman Al Mubarokfuri. (n.d.). Sirah Nabawiyah (Y. Maqosid, Ed.). Pustaka Al-Kautsar.
Siska Rejeki, Deni, & Eri Saputra. (2023). Tata Keruangan Aktivitas Masjid Raya Ruhama Kota Takengon. ETNIK : Jurnal Ekonomi –Teknik, 12(2), 1131–1144.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salsa Syafiqa, Deni, Hendra A, Dela Andriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s).
2. The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work.
5. Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.